At supermarkets, it can be mind-blowing when one comes
across endless shelves of different wine brands. The consumer is confronted
with so many choices. Time is of an essence. What do we choose? Most of the
time, it is the eye-catching bottle that has a nice label. The physical played
the most part in making a decision. Sounds a little like me when I choose to
hook up with a woman because of her looks without considering the goodness of
her character. By the end of the night, the woman, just like the wine, disappoints.
An article was published in The Economist on February 11th 2012, titled “Sex and love”. Some interesting points brought up were:
1. Internet dating sites offer a huge range of
choices and a system that can help match your specifications as to what you are
looking for in a partner. Thus, it assumed that finding a suitable long-term
partner through the internet would be easier.
2. Data suggest that we do not know what we want
and that our preferences differ from our selected choice.
3. When presented with a large volume of choices,
less attention is paid to characteristics that require evaluation by both thinking
and conversation. Instead, more attention is paid to the physical attributes.
This applies in the context of wines. With internet sales getting more popular, it still doesn’t solve the choice dilemma in supermarkets. There may be more misses than hits, even if you were to use the advanced search to narrow down your choices. This re-affirms the old adage that less is more.
Many do not know what wines they are looking for. Sommeliers get frustrated with such customers. You help narrow down their choices and they still don’t like the wines. Knowing what your preferences are requires time and opportunity to taste various wine styles. You know you like it when you keep coming back to it. I love big oaky vanilla-flavoured reds and rich buttery chardonnay. What about you?
give me mineral whites and floral red
ReplyDelete